[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [LANdb] Suggested schema and app changes



>  Yep, as I said, operational mode for a port, either trunk or 
> not. To be 
>  correct I suggest that a PORT has an associated list of 
> VLANs, and for
>  each VLAN there has to be a variable specifying if transmitted frames
>  should be tagged or untagged. OK, propably a variable 
> stating the operational
>  mode on a per port basis would be sufficient for now.

Agreed...
 
>  Definitely not, (port, switch) is unique, so there should be 
> no problem. Jack

Do you mean (port, module, switch)?

>  should be unique in a closet, not in a building. After all, 
> jack is actually
>  more bound to the closet, not the building. Building 
> contains closets, closets
>  contain jacks. Hmm, errr, well, that's open for debate.

I agree, but in the interests of simplicity I would argue that a jack
belongs to a building.  I would think that most of the queries would be
between jack and building, so making a jack relate to a closet adds an extra
join.

>  IMHO (which is just what it is, humble:) we should have a 
> "cable" table, with
>  poatches, connectors, etc. cables could be connected to 
> other cables using
>  patches. Here:
> 
> CABLE     ( cableid, media, whatever_what_not ...)
> CONNECTOR ( cableid, connectorid (jack, closet, building), type, ...)
>   PATCH   ( cableid, connectorid, patchid ) or 
>   PATCH   ( cable1id, cable2id, connector1id, connector2id )
> 
>  roughly translated: 
> 
> CABLE ( cableid, media, whatever_what_not ... )
> JACK  ( jack_idx, cableid, connector type, name, closet, ... )
>   PATCH ( jack1_idx, jack2_idx )   or
>   PATCH ( patchid, jack_idx ) if one could patch more than 
> two cables at once.
> 
>  Or something of the sort. This would allow one to draw a 
> graph of the entire
>  physical network, a feature I would value. Hmh, how would 
> one document a wireless
>  LAN? :)

erp... that is a good one :)   I like your idea here, but I'll run through a
couple of examples on paper here before I comment.
 
Sean

> > No, no subnet can span more than one Vlan, that I know of 
> (imagine trying to route
> > to two identical subnets that are actually on two separate 
> vlans.. eck?).  And
> 
>   eck? Not really special:
> 
>    router --1-- firewall --2-- subnet
>                 proxyarp
> 
>   now, 1 is subnet 192.168.0.0/24 vlan 10, and 2 is allso 
> 192.168.0.0/24 vlan 11. 
>   the actual physical connection is quite funny:
> 
>    switchrouter ---vlan 11---> hosts
>      |
>      |
>    vlan 10, 11
>      |
>      |
>    switch --vlan 10--> firewall -+
>      | ^                         |
>      | +-----vlan 11-------------+
>      |
>      +---vlan 11--> hosts
> 
>   if the firewall would be a router aswell, vlan 10 could 
> contain several subnets.
>   
>                       
> > Q: What subnet is that machine on?  A: Duh, what's it's IP?
> 
>  I have a printer which IP is 10.2.10.1, which also happens 
> to be my management
>  station. Naturally they are in different VLANs.. Duh? The IP 
> address really
>  doesn't have to be unique, really.
> 
> > Q: What Vlan is that machine on?  A: Lemme look up its port...
> 
>  Yep, that's the case. This could ofcourse produce several VLANs.
> 
> -- 
> <HTML><B>"            Teddy 'tricky' Grenman          " </B><SPAN 
> MAILADDR="               tricky@cs.hut.fi             " 
> STYLE="position
> :absolute">        http://www.cs.hut.fi/~tricky      <"<TABLE><TR><TD>
> <TABLE><TR><TD><TABLE>       </TABLE>       </TD></TR></TABLE></TABLE>
> 

-------------------------------------
LANdb - The Network Management Database
To unsubscribe, send email to landb-request@avenir.dhs.org
	and put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line
Administrative contact: weez@avenir.dhs.org
-------------------------------------